Scores

WebVoyager scores

Model size
All sizes
Choose model sizes
Open weightsClosed weightsMixed / uncertain
How model sizes and weights are classified

Size classes follow the Artificial Analysis categories: Tiny ≤4B; Small >4–40B; Medium >40–150B; Large >150B total parameters. Active MoE parameters are reported separately.

When parameters are unavailable, we use standard uncached token prices with a 3:1 input/output blend: Small <$0.15/M, Medium $0.15–$1/M, Large >$1/M. “Price proxy” is a pricing category, not a parameter estimate. “Estimated” marks a provisional classification and remains included in filters. “Unclassified” results await model research and match only the all and mixed / uncertain weight filters.

Harnesses inherit the evaluated model stack's class. Multi-model systems use the largest component category as an approximation. Open weights requires released weights for every required model; open harness code alone does not qualify. Unverified backbones and unavailable evaluated checkpoints are marked uncertain.

Results compare evaluated systems, including their tools, compute budgets, and context strategies. Size categories do not guarantee hardware compatibility. Suggest a correction ↗

Results

Agent scope · 22 systems
RankSystem / submissionScore ↓Model classReportedSource
1browser-control (Fable 5)NewOm Labs · Harness
Evaluation & model details

Shell-native CDP harness driving Fable 5; 610/615 after four documented current-impossible exclusions; GPT-5.5 Alumnium-vanilla judge. Self-reported.

Published runner names claude-fable-5 through Claude Code with the public browser-control CDP tool. GPT-5.5 is an external scoring judge and is excluded. The author warns that the evaluated Fable 5 availability changed after the run; released harness code does not imply open model weights.

Harness code: open. Price proxy: the size class comes from the standard token price of Claude Fable 5; parameters are undisclosed.

Claude Fable 5

Closed weights · Large · Price proxy

Token price: $10 input / $50 output per million. Blended 3:1: $20/M.

Undisclosed parameters; size uses standard uncached token pricing. Tool charges excluded.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

99.19%Closed weightsLargePrice proxy2026-06Source ↗Repository ↗
2AlumniumNewAlumnium · Harness
Evaluation & model details

Claude Code orchestrating Alumnium MCP with GPT-5 Nano + Selenium; accessibility-tree parsing with visual reasoning.

March 2026 setup uses Claude Code/Sonnet 4.6 as orchestrator and Alumnium MCP 0.18/GPT-5 nano as browser subagent. Both are required runtime models; the stack uses the larger category. GPT-5 only scores completed trajectories and is excluded.

Harness code: open. Price proxy: the size class comes from the standard token price of Claude Sonnet 4.6; parameters are undisclosed. Size reflects the largest of 2 models; parameters are not summed.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Closed weights · Large · Price proxy

Token price: $3 input / $15 output per million. Blended 3:1: $6/M.

Undisclosed parameters; size uses standard uncached token pricing. Tool charges excluded.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

GPT-5 nano

Closed weights · Small · Price proxy

Token price: $0.05 input / $0.4 output per million. Blended 3:1: $0.1375/M.

Hosted OpenAI model; total parameters undisclosed. Standard uncached $0.05 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens gives a $0.1375 blend, below the Small cutoff. Alumnium uses it as the browser subagent.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

98.5%Closed weightsLargePrice proxyLargest component2026-03Source ↗Repository ↗
3Surfer 2H Company · System
Evaluation & model details

System-level orchestration with submitter-defined setup details.

Table 1’s WebVoyager stack is o3 orchestration, Sonnet 4.5 policy, GPT-4.1 validation and Holo1.5-7B localization. Validation feeds retries, so it is runtime. This differs from the paper’s WebArena configuration. Mixed open/closed weights; release of the exact Surfer 2 harness was not verified.

Harness code: uncertain. Price proxy: the size class comes from the standard token price of o3, Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-4.1; parameters are undisclosed. Size reflects the largest of 4 models; parameters are not summed.

o3

Closed weights · Large · Price proxy

Token price: $2 input / $8 output per million. Blended 3:1: $3.5/M.

Parameter count is undisclosed. Large is a price proxy from standard uncached API text rates; it does not assert a physical parameter size. Tool fees and cached, batch, flex, and priority rates are excluded.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Closed weights · Large · Price proxy

Token price: $3 input / $15 output per million. Blended 3:1: $6/M.

Closed hosted model with undisclosed parameter count. Published standard uncached first-party text prices are $3 input/$15 output per million tokens, giving a $6/M blend and Large price-proxy category. Cache, batch, and tool charges are excluded. This uses the standard context tier (up to 200K input tokens), not long-context premium pricing.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

GPT-4.1

Closed weights · Large · Price proxy

Token price: $2 input / $8 output per million. Blended 3:1: $3.5/M.

Hosted OpenAI GPT-4.1 family with published 2025-04-14 snapshot; parameters undisclosed. Standard uncached $2/$8 token prices give a $3.50 blend. Surfer 2 uses it for validation inside the action/retry loop.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

Holo1.5-7B

Open weights · Small · Published size · 8.292B total

Public ungated Apache-2.0 checkpoint with four downloadable safetensors shards. Inventory reports 8,292,166,656 total parameters including the vision components; the 7B product name describes the language-model scale. Use the inventory total for classification.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

97.1%Mixed weightsLargePrice proxyLargest component2025-10Source ↗
4MagnitudeMagnitude · Harness
Evaluation & model details

Open-source architecture utilizing a modular agentic stack.

The 93.9% report and public runner identify Claude Sonnet 4; code pins claude-sonnet-4-20250514 through Claude Code. Original magnitude.run/webvoyager redirects to a missing page; the author’s evaluation repository supplies the recovered evidence.

Harness code: open. Price proxy: the size class comes from the standard token price of Claude Sonnet 4 (20250514); parameters are undisclosed.

Claude Sonnet 4 (20250514)

Closed weights · Large · Price proxy

Token price: $3 input / $15 output per million. Blended 3:1: $6/M.

Magnitude runner pins claude-sonnet-4-20250514. Parameters undisclosed. Standard uncached $3/$15 per 1M tokens gives a $6 blend. Claude Code is the provider wrapper, not another separately counted model.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

93.9%Closed weightsLargePrice proxy2025-07Source ↗Repository ↗
5Surfer-H + Holo1H Company · Harness
Evaluation & model details

Multi-modal action kernels integrated via H-Company research.

The 92.2% Table 5 run uses Holo1-7B policy/localization plus GPT-4o validation with up to ten attempts. The validator supplies retry feedback and must be included; the all-Holo variant scores differently. GPT-4o snapshot is unpinned. Open CLI code and Holo weights do not make this mixed stack all-open.

Harness code: open. Estimated for GPT-4o (historical snapshot unspecified): no verified parameter count or standard token price, so the size class is provisional. Size reflects the largest of 2 models; parameters are not summed.

Holo1-7B

Open weights · Small · Published size · 8.292B total

Public ungated Apache-2.0 checkpoint with four downloadable safetensors shards. Inventory reports 8,292,166,656 total parameters including the vision components; the 7B product name describes the language-model scale. Use the inventory total for classification.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

GPT-4o (historical snapshot unspecified)

Closed weights · Large · Estimated

Reports/configurations name GPT-4o without a verifiable snapshot or use an unpinned Azure deployment alias. Keep separate from May, August and November 2024 checkpoints. Large is provisional from known GPT-4o standard price tiers; no exact tariff or parameter count is assigned to these historical runs.

Checked 2026-10-10 · low confidence

92.2%Mixed weightsLargeEstimatedLargest component2025-06Source ↗Repository ↗
6browser-control (Opus 4.8)Newbrowser-control · Harness
Evaluation & model details

Shell-native CDP harness driving Claude Opus 4.8; 556/615 on a model-specific layer with 47 prompt edits; GPT-5.5 Alumnium-vanilla judge. Self-reported.

Published runner names claude-opus-4-8 through Claude Code with public browser-control tooling. GPT-5.5 evaluates completed runs and is excluded from the runtime. Open harness code is distinct from closed Claude weights.

Harness code: open. Price proxy: the size class comes from the standard token price of Claude Opus 4.8; parameters are undisclosed.

Claude Opus 4.8

Closed weights · Large · Price proxy

Token price: $5 input / $25 output per million. Blended 3:1: $10/M.

Undisclosed parameters; size uses standard uncached token pricing. Tool charges excluded.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

90.41%Closed weightsLargePrice proxy2026-06Source ↗Repository ↗
7BrowserableBrowserable · Harness
Evaluation & model details

Fine-tuned browser control models within a commercial framework.

Author report specifies Gemini 2.0 Flash primary with GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet fallbacks for rate limits. Include the available fallback stack; invocation shares and historical snapshots are unspecified. The retrieved report does not establish custom released fine-tuned weights.

Harness code: open. Estimated for GPT-4o (historical snapshot unspecified), Claude 3.5 Sonnet (historical unpinned snapshot): no verified parameter count or standard token price, so the size class is provisional. Size reflects the largest of 3 models; parameters are not summed.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Closed weights · Medium · Price proxy

Token price: $0.15 input / $0.6 output per million. Blended 3:1: $0.2625/M.

Hosted Gemini 2.0 Flash; parameters undisclosed. Google Cloud publishes standard uncached text/image/video input $0.15 and text output $0.60 per 1M tokens, a $0.2625 blend. This is the verified Vertex tariff, not a claim about historical benchmark billing or free quotas; the current Developer API price page no longer lists this model.

Checked 2026-10-10 · medium confidence

GPT-4o (historical snapshot unspecified)

Closed weights · Large · Estimated

Reports/configurations name GPT-4o without a verifiable snapshot or use an unpinned Azure deployment alias. Keep separate from May, August and November 2024 checkpoints. Large is provisional from known GPT-4o standard price tiers; no exact tariff or parameter count is assigned to these historical runs.

Checked 2026-10-10 · low confidence

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (historical unpinned snapshot)

Closed weights · Large · Estimated

The source identifies Claude 3.5 Sonnet but not its June/October snapshot. Provisional Large follows this proprietary frontier family; parameters and an exact evaluated-version tariff are not asserted. Snapshot-specific records remain separate.

Checked 2026-10-10 · low confidence

90.4%Closed weightsLargeEstimatedLargest component2025-04Source ↗Repository ↗
8Browser UseBrowser Use · Harness
Evaluation & model details

Multi-step orchestration framework for open-source automation.

December 2024 report names GPT-4o; public evaluation code routes Azure deployments named gpt-4o without a verifiable snapshot. Keep historical identity provisional. External scoring model is excluded. Public harness code does not imply open GPT-4o weights.

Harness code: open. Estimated for GPT-4o (historical snapshot unspecified): no verified parameter count or standard token price, so the size class is provisional.

GPT-4o (historical snapshot unspecified)

Closed weights · Large · Estimated

Reports/configurations name GPT-4o without a verifiable snapshot or use an unpinned Azure deployment alias. Keep separate from May, August and November 2024 checkpoints. Large is provisional from known GPT-4o standard price tiers; no exact tariff or parameter count is assigned to these historical runs.

Checked 2026-10-10 · low confidence

89.1%Closed weightsLargeEstimated2024-12Source ↗Repository ↗
9GLM-5V-TurboNewZ.ai · Model
Evaluation & model details

Multimodal vision model optimized for GUI automation and coding tasks.

Known Z.ai hosted model; parameter total and released evaluated weights are unverified. Large comes from the serving provider’s published standard token-price proxy, not a parameter estimate or another GLM model’s architecture.

Harness code: not separately classified. Price proxy: the size class comes from the standard token price of GLM-5V-Turbo; parameters are undisclosed.

GLM-5V-Turbo

Uncertain weights · Large · Price proxy

Token price: $1.2 input / $4 output per million. Blended 3:1: $1.9/M.

Exact multimodal API model is documented, but its parameter count and evaluated weights are not verified. The Z.AI pricing page currently omits this model; the serving Vercel AI Gateway directly lists its Z.AI route at standard $1.20 input/$4 output per million tokens (200K context), a $1.90/M blend. This is a provider price proxy, not a claim about parameter size. The exact zai-org checkpoint lookup returns HTTP 401 and the author search has no 5V release.

Checked 2026-10-10 · medium confidence

88.5%Uncertain weightsLargePrice proxy2026-04Source ↗
10Agent KuraKura · System
Evaluation & model details

602/643 tasks (41 removed for invalid/auth issues); reported on trykura.com.

Kura describes an o1 initial planner plus GPT-4o loop planner, executor, critic and final critic. Historical snapshots are unpinned; the currently served primary pages do not prove a November 2024 checkpoint. Steel retrieved the JavaScript-rendered pages. Public benchmark assets do not establish release of the full agent implementation.

Harness code: uncertain. Estimated for OpenAI o1 family (Kura historical run), GPT-4o (historical snapshot unspecified): no verified parameter count or standard token price, so the size class is provisional. Size reflects the largest of 2 models; parameters are not summed.

OpenAI o1 family (Kura historical run)

Closed weights · Large · Estimated

Kura names OpenAI o1 for its initial planner without a snapshot. The historical timing may indicate o1-preview, but this is unconfirmed and must not be replaced silently by the later full o1 checkpoint. Provisional Large follows the o1 frontier reasoning family’s known price class; exact parameters and run-specific tariff are unavailable.

Checked 2026-10-10 · low confidence

GPT-4o (historical snapshot unspecified)

Closed weights · Large · Estimated

Reports/configurations name GPT-4o without a verifiable snapshot or use an unpinned Azure deployment alias. Keep separate from May, August and November 2024 checkpoints. Large is provisional from known GPT-4o standard price tiers; no exact tariff or parameter count is assigned to these historical runs.

Checked 2026-10-10 · low confidence

87.0%Closed weightsLargeEstimatedLargest component2024-11Source ↗
10OperatorOpenAI · System
Evaluation & model details

Native browser integration using proprietary vision-control models.

Original January 2025 Operator uses OpenAI’s computer-using agent. Keep it separate from later computer-use-preview/API snapshots and tariffs; original model scale remains a provisional estimate.

Harness code: closed. Estimated for OpenAI original Computer-Using Agent (January 2025): no verified parameter count or standard token price, so the size class is provisional.

OpenAI original Computer-Using Agent (January 2025)

Closed weights · Large · Estimated

The original Operator CUA combines GPT-4o vision with reinforcement-learned reasoning. Its parameter count and January evaluation token prices are undisclosed. Large is a provisional category informed by the GPT-4o-based frontier architecture and later computer-use-preview pricing, not a parameter estimate or assertion that the March API snapshot is identical. Do not substitute later o3-based Operator or computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 for this historical model.

Checked 2026-10-10 · medium confidence

87%Closed weightsLargeEstimated2025-01Source ↗
12NotteNotte · Harness
Evaluation & model details

Self-reported score from Notte's open-operator-evals harness (79.0% under LLM evaluation).

The v1.3.3 report attributes 86.2% to Gemini 2.0 Flash on WebVoyager30, a 30-task subset run eight times, using self-reported completion. Configuration and handler set both reasoning and perception to Gemini; the default Llama helper is overridden. The published external LLM score differs; preserve the existing leaderboard result.

Harness code: open. Price proxy: the size class comes from the standard token price of Gemini 2.0 Flash; parameters are undisclosed.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Closed weights · Medium · Price proxy

Token price: $0.15 input / $0.6 output per million. Blended 3:1: $0.2625/M.

Hosted Gemini 2.0 Flash; parameters undisclosed. Google Cloud publishes standard uncached text/image/video input $0.15 and text output $0.60 per 1M tokens, a $0.2625 blend. This is the verified Vertex tariff, not a claim about historical benchmark billing or free quotas; the current Developer API price page no longer lists this model.

Checked 2026-10-10 · medium confidence

86.2%Closed weightsMediumPrice proxy2025-04Source ↗Repository ↗
13Skyvern 2.0Skyvern · Harness
Evaluation & model details

DOM-level reasoning coupled with real-time error-correction.

Historical benchmark setup names GPT-4o and GPT-4o-mini as decision models and runs on Skyvern Cloud. The currently updated blog retains this setup, but does not pin GPT-4o’s snapshot. Public Skyvern harness code is separate from the closed hosted model weights.

Harness code: open. Estimated for GPT-4o (historical snapshot unspecified): no verified parameter count or standard token price, so the size class is provisional. Size reflects the largest of 2 models; parameters are not summed.

GPT-4o (historical snapshot unspecified)

Closed weights · Large · Estimated

Reports/configurations name GPT-4o without a verifiable snapshot or use an unpinned Azure deployment alias. Keep separate from May, August and November 2024 checkpoints. Large is provisional from known GPT-4o standard price tiers; no exact tariff or parameter count is assigned to these historical runs.

Checked 2026-10-10 · low confidence

GPT-4o mini

Closed weights · Medium · Price proxy

Token price: $0.15 input / $0.6 output per million. Blended 3:1: $0.2625/M.

Standard uncached input/output pricing gives a $0.2625/M blend: Medium price proxy. InfoAgent uses this hosted model for search snippets. Parameter count is undisclosed.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

85.85%Closed weightsLargeEstimatedLargest component2025-01Source ↗Repository ↗
14Project MarinerGoogle · System
Evaluation & model details

Gemini-powered reasoning with precise visual grounding.

December 2024 source describes the 83.5% single-agent research prototype as built with Gemini 2.0. It does not identify Flash or disclose an independently priced model checkpoint. Model category remains a low-confidence estimate.

Harness code: closed. Estimated for Project Mariner Gemini 2.0 prototype: no verified parameter count or standard token price, so the size class is provisional.

Project Mariner Gemini 2.0 prototype

Closed weights · Large · Estimated

Google identifies a December 2024 research prototype built with Gemini 2.0, without a public model checkpoint, parameter count or model-specific token price. It is not identified as Gemini 2.0 Flash. Large is a low-confidence frontier-agent prior; actual scale could fall in a smaller category.

Checked 2026-10-10 · low confidence

83.5%Closed weightsLargeEstimated2024-12Source ↗
15Wuying-Browser-Agent-27BNewAlibaba Cloud · System
Evaluation & model details

Alibaba self-report: pass@1 on WebVoyager (643-task benchmark), 100 steps, custom browser-use with DOM and screenshots; the judge family also supplies RL rewards, with 96.4% agreement in a 500-trajectory human audit.

The evaluated fine-tuned policy is identified by the primary paper; scoring judges and training teachers are excluded from the runtime model classification. Exact evaluated weight availability has not been verified in this refresh.

Harness code: uncertain. Published size: from the parameter count of Wuying-Browser-Agent-27B.

Wuying-Browser-Agent-27B

Uncertain weights · Small · Published size · 27B total

Qwen3.5-27B-based trained browser policy; 27B is the published nominal parameter count. The paper describes an open-source release, but exact evaluated checkpoint files and harness release were not independently verified in this refresh.

Checked 2026-10-11 · medium confidence

80.6%Uncertain weightsSmall2026-08-18Source ↗
16Agent-EEmergence AI · Harness
Evaluation & model details

Hierarchical planning modules within a multi-agent framework.

The paper uses GPT-4 Turbo for planner and browser navigator; July 2024 README recommends stable gpt-4-turbo. Mapping to the 2024-04-09 stable snapshot follows that API alias, not an explicit evaluation snapshot log. Current repository examples using other models do not replace the historical setup.

Harness code: open. Price proxy: the size class comes from the standard token price of GPT-4 Turbo (2024-04-09); parameters are undisclosed.

GPT-4 Turbo (2024-04-09)

Closed weights · Large · Price proxy

Token price: $10 input / $30 output per million. Blended 3:1: $15/M.

Parameters are undisclosed. Standard uncached USD text token prices per million determine the category; tool fees and cache/batch discounts are excluded. The stable Turbo snapshot is distinct from earlier previews.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

73.2%Closed weightsLargePrice proxy2024-07Source ↗Repository ↗
17WebSightAcademic Research · Harness
Evaluation & model details

Navigation system prioritizing visual-only perceptual inputs.

Paper and agent code use GPT-4.1 mini planning/next-action reasoning plus the released WebSight-7B action checkpoint. This is a mixed-weight runtime, so the open action model alone does not make the submission open. Teachers and external scoring judges are excluded.

Harness code: open. Price proxy: the size class comes from the standard token price of GPT-4.1 mini; parameters are undisclosed. Size reflects the largest of 2 models; parameters are not summed.

WebSight-7B

Open weights · Small · Published size · 8.292B total

The agent loads tanvirb/websight-7B, a merged UI-TARS-1.5-7B fine-tune. Public ungated Apache-2.0 repository has four full safetensors shards, in addition to archived adapters. Inventory total is 8,292,166,656 parameters including vision components.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

GPT-4.1 mini

Closed weights · Medium · Price proxy

Token price: $0.4 input / $1.6 output per million. Blended 3:1: $0.7/M.

Hosted OpenAI model; parameters undisclosed. Standard uncached $0.40/$1.60 token prices give a $0.70 blend. The WebSight code names the GPT-4.1 mini API alias for planning and next-action reasoning.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

68%Mixed weightsMediumPrice proxyLargest component2025-08Source ↗
18Runner H 0.1H Company · System
Evaluation & model details

Foundational agent architecture for general web interaction.

Historical report identifies internal H-VLM 3B and H-LLM 2B plus unspecified external runtime models. Retain all three components; do not substitute later open Holo weights. GPT-4o is identified only for evaluation. Original source moved; author’s archived research update was retrieved.

Harness code: uncertain. Estimated for Runner H 0.1 external model stack (undisclosed): no verified parameter count or standard token price, so the size class is provisional. Size reflects the largest of 3 models; parameters are not summed.

Runner H H-VLM 3B

Uncertain weights · Tiny · Published size · 3B total

H Company’s historical report specifies a 3B vision-language runtime model. This is the original internal H-VLM, not the later Holo1 release. No downloadable evaluated checkpoint was verified, so weights availability remains uncertain.

Checked 2026-10-10 · medium confidence

Runner H H-LLM 2B

Uncertain weights · Tiny · Published size · 2B total

H Company’s historical report specifies a 2B language runtime model. This is the original internal H-LLM, not a later Holo checkpoint. No downloadable evaluated checkpoint was verified, so weights availability remains uncertain.

Checked 2026-10-10 · medium confidence

Runner H 0.1 external model stack (undisclosed)

Uncertain weights · Large · Estimated

The author says Runner H combines internal and external models but does not identify the external runtime models. Large is a provisional frontier-provider prior, not a disclosed parameter or price measurement. GPT-4o is named as a scoring evaluator only and does not establish this runtime identity.

Checked 2026-10-10 · low confidence

67%Uncertain weightsLargeEstimatedLargest component2025-03Source ↗
19WebVoyagerAcademic Research · Harness
Evaluation & model details

Baseline implementation using standard multimodal LLM control.

Original agent paper uses gpt-4-vision-preview. GPT-4 Turbo used to generate tasks and the external evaluation judge are excluded from runtime classification. Public Selenium agent code is separate from the closed model.

Harness code: open. Price proxy: the size class comes from the standard token price of GPT-4 Vision preview; parameters are undisclosed.

GPT-4 Vision preview

Closed weights · Large · Price proxy

Token price: $10 input / $30 output per million. Blended 3:1: $15/M.

Original GPT-4 Vision preview, also listed as gpt-4-1106-vision-preview in OpenAI deprecations. Parameters undisclosed. Historical standard uncached $10/$30 token rates give a $15 blend; model was retired in December 2024.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

59.1%Closed weightsLargePrice proxy2024-01Source ↗Repository ↗
20Anthropic Computer Use 3.5Anthropic · Harness
Evaluation & model details

Sampled 50/602 tasks for direct comparison; reported on trykura.com.

Kura’s comparison uses Anthropic’s official computer-use demo. October 2024 upgraded Sonnet is the supported historical computer-use model; this is a release-date inference rather than a snapshot log. The 56% comparison is on 50 tasks. Demo code availability does not imply open weights.

Harness code: open. Price proxy: the size class comes from the standard token price of Claude 3.5 Sonnet (20241022); parameters are undisclosed.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (20241022)

Closed weights · Large · Price proxy

Token price: $3 input / $15 output per million. Blended 3:1: $6/M.

October 2024 upgraded Sonnet introduced computer use. Parameters undisclosed. Anthropic kept the predecessor’s standard $3/$15 token prices, giving a $6 blend. Historical Kura comparison identifies the official computer-use demo, not an explicitly logged snapshot.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

56.0%Closed weightsLargePrice proxy2024-11Source ↗

About this benchmark

WebVoyager evaluates end-to-end browser agents on 643 tasks across 15 popular real-world websites. Tasks cover search, navigation, form filling, map and travel lookup, shopping, and information retrieval on live pages rather than static snapshots.

It is useful as a browser-agent adoption signal because many commercial and open-source agents report it, but it is unusually sensitive to task drift, removed tasks, evaluator choice, and whether the run used the full task suite.

Read each row as a full-system result: model, prompt, browser execution layer, retry policy, DOM or accessibility extraction, and visual grounding can all contribute to the final score.

WebVoyager is high-visibility but not fully standardized across modern submissions; small score gaps can reflect setup choices as much as capability.

Example tasks

Three public tasks quoted from benchmark sources:

Methodology

  • Primary metric is task success rate: completed tasks divided by evaluated tasks. The original paper used GPT-4V as an automatic evaluator and reported 85.3% agreement with human judgment.
  • We prioritize public sources that identify the system, score, task subset or evaluator when available, and a paper, repository, model card, or launch post that can be checked later.
  • Direct comparisons are strongest when systems run the same task set, same evaluator, same attempt policy, and same handling of stale or auth-gated tasks.
  • Rows that use filtered task subsets, manual correction, or custom judges are kept when source-linked, but notes should be read before treating adjacent ranks as meaningful differences.

Related benchmarks

Compare this benchmark with related pages from the hub:

Back to benchmark hub

Frequently asked questions

Which system is currently best on WebVoyager? +
browser-control (Fable 5) is the system/agent setup currently leading with a tracked score of 99.19%. This ranking reflects submitted system setups (model plus tools and policy), not just a base model. Based on our latest tracked results, last updated Oct 11, 2026.
What should I read into a WebVoyager score? +
WebVoyager scores are most useful for within-benchmark ranking. Read the Notes column to understand setup context, and use the methodology section before making procurement or architecture decisions.
Are these independently verified? +
Not always. Some rows are independently benchmarked and some are team-reported. Use each source link and notes field to verify evidence level before drawing strong conclusions.
Can I compare every row directly? +
Use caution. Rows can vary by evaluator, harness, attempt budget, tool access, task filtering, or verification level. Source links and notes are part of the score, not decoration.
How is WebVoyager different from WebArena? +
WebVoyager runs on live public websites and therefore captures drift, anti-bot behavior, and production UI variance. WebArena is self-hosted and more reproducible, making it better for controlled experiments and ablations.
Why do WebVoyager scores vary between sources? +
Modern submissions may remove stale tasks, use different judges, allow different retry budgets, or manually audit evaluator mistakes. Those choices can move scores without representing a clean capability difference.
Is WebVoyager enough to pick a production browser agent? +
No. It is a useful directional signal for navigation and retrieval, but production selection should also test latency, cost, authentication flows, CAPTCHA or bot defenses, reliability on your own target sites, and recovery from partial failures.