Scores

WebArena scores

Model size
All sizes
Choose model sizes
Open weightsClosed weightsMixed / uncertain
How model sizes and weights are classified

Size classes follow the Artificial Analysis categories: Tiny ≤4B; Small >4–40B; Medium >40–150B; Large >150B total parameters. Active MoE parameters are reported separately.

When parameters are unavailable, we use standard uncached token prices with a 3:1 input/output blend: Small <$0.15/M, Medium $0.15–$1/M, Large >$1/M. “Price proxy” is a pricing category, not a parameter estimate. “Estimated” marks a provisional classification and remains included in filters. “Unclassified” results await model research and match only the all and mixed / uncertain weight filters.

Harnesses inherit the evaluated model stack's class. Multi-model systems use the largest component category as an approximation. Open weights requires released weights for every required model; open harness code alone does not qualify. Unverified backbones and unavailable evaluated checkpoints are marked uncertain.

Results compare evaluated systems, including their tools, compute budgets, and context strategies. Size categories do not guarantee hardware compatibility. Suggest a correction ↗

Results

Agent scope · 52 systems
RankSystem / submissionScore ↓Model classReportedSource
1WebTactix (DeepSeek v3.2)WebTactix · System
Evaluation & model details

Project reports 594 correct, 205 failed, and 13 N/A among 812 tasks; 74.34% excludes the 13 N/A tasks (594/799). DeepSeek v3.2 runtime.

WebTactix semantic-tree search uses the reported DeepSeek-V3.2 backbone across constraint, extraction, planning and decision roles. Public code shares one selected LLM client; the current deepseek-chat alias is mutable, so the historical named version is retained.

Harness code: open. Published size: from the parameter count of DeepSeek-V3.2.

DeepSeek-V3.2

Open weights · Large · Published size · 685.355B total

MIT downloadable weights verified. Total is publisher safetensors metadata, rounded in billions, including auxiliary tensors. V3.2 adds sparse-attention indexing to the V3.1 architecture; active count was not independently established here. Current API pricing page now describes successor models, so historical V3.2 prices remain unset.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

74.3%Open weightsLarge2026-02Source ↗Repository ↗
2OpAgentCodeFuse AI · System
Evaluation & model details

Open-source multi-agent browser system; repository publishes the WebArena result and final trajectories.

Paper section 4.3 uses Gemini-3-Pro for planner, reflector and summarizer, plus a separately post-trained Qwen2.5-VL-72B-MFT grounder. Released OpAgent-32B belongs to the later single-model mode and cannot identify this 71.6 system.

Harness code: open. Estimated for Gemini 3 Pro: no verified parameter count or standard token price, so the size class is provisional. Size reflects the largest of 2 models; parameters are not summed.

Gemini 3 Pro

Closed weights · Large · Estimated

Provisional Large based on Google’s flagship Pro positioning. Parameters are undisclosed; current Google pricing pages have replaced this version with Gemini 3.1 Pro, so no exact-version current token rate is asserted.

Checked 2026-10-10 · low confidence

OpAgent Qwen2.5-VL-72B-MFT grounder

Uncertain weights · Medium · Published size · 72B total

Paper section 4.3 names this post-trained 72B grounder. The public organization inventory lists OpAgent-32B, a different later single-model release; no matching 72B-MFT checkpoint was found. Open base weights and public orchestration code do not establish release of this fine-tune.

Checked 2026-10-10 · medium confidence

71.6%Uncertain weightsLargeEstimatedLargest component2026-01Source ↗Repository ↗
3ColorBrowserAgentMadeAgents · Harness
Evaluation & model details

Human-like browser agent result; code and trajectories are public in the MadeAgents repository.

ColorBrowserAgent paper and launch README explicitly use GPT-5. Site-prior generation belongs to the same framework; no distinct required runtime model is identified.

Harness code: open. Price proxy: the size class comes from the standard token price of GPT-5; parameters are undisclosed.

GPT-5

Closed weights · Large · Price proxy

Token price: $1.25 input / $10 output per million. Blended 3:1: $3.4375/M.

Parameter count is undisclosed. Large is a price proxy from standard uncached API text rates; it does not assert a physical parameter size. Tool fees and cached, batch, flex, and priority rates are excluded.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

71.2%Closed weightsLargePrice proxy2025-12Source ↗Repository ↗
4Claude Code + GBOX MCPGBOX AI · Harness
Evaluation & model details

Claude Code backed by GBOX MCP scaffolding; public report and trajectories are in the BabelCloud WebArena repository.

Published agent defaults and an October 25 execution log identify Bedrock claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929. Logs and the report also require GBOX semantic visual targeting; a separate hosted coordinate model is represented explicitly because its historical identity and weights are unverified. Current gbox-handy-1 documentation is not an exact historical model pin. Public orchestration code is separate from the hosted grounding service.

Harness code: open. Estimated for GBOX historical visual-coordinate model (unidentified): no verified parameter count or standard token price, so the size class is provisional. Size reflects the largest of 2 models; parameters are not summed.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Closed weights · Large · Price proxy

Token price: $3 input / $15 output per million. Blended 3:1: $6/M.

Closed hosted model with undisclosed parameter count. Published standard uncached first-party text prices are $3 input/$15 output per million tokens, giving a $6/M blend and Large price-proxy category. Cache, batch, and tool charges are excluded. This uses the standard context tier (up to 200K input tokens), not long-context premium pricing.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

GBOX historical visual-coordinate model (unidentified)

Uncertain weights · Large · Estimated

The reported October 2025 runtime uses natural-language screenshot targeting delegated to GBOX, in addition to Claude reasoning. Current documentation names gbox-handy-1, but does not pin the historical run or disclose parameters, token prices, or matching released weights. Large is a provisional estimate allowing an undisclosed frontier vision backend; no numerical parameter claim is made. The known Sonnet component already places the complete stack in Large.

Checked 2026-10-11 · low confidence

68.0%Uncertain weightsLargeEstimatedLargest component2025-10-25Source ↗Repository ↗
5DeepSky AgentDeepSky · System
Evaluation & model details

Public tracker row; no separate public source or repository link was found in the tracker.

The tracker does not disclose a backbone or implementation link. Full model stack remains a labeled estimate.

Harness code: uncertain. Estimated for DeepSky Agent historical model stack: no verified parameter count or standard token price, so the size class is provisional.

DeepSky Agent historical model stack

Uncertain weights · Large · Estimated

Only the public tracker corroborates this named system; no primary model identity, released checkpoint or token tariff was found. Large is a low-confidence estimate for the high-performing managed agent, not a claimed model size.

Checked 2026-10-10 · low confidence

66.9%Uncertain weightsLargeEstimated2025-09Source ↗
6Narada AINarada AI · System
Evaluation & model details

Narada blog and public tracker report the WebArena result; no public code repository was found.

Vendor-operated system. The blog establishes the result and design lineage without identifying exact inference models.

Harness code: closed. Estimated for Narada Operator historical model stack: no verified parameter count or standard token price, so the size class is provisional.

Narada Operator historical model stack

Uncertain weights · Large · Estimated

The vendor post describes a proprietary operator and links Plan-and-Act research, but does not name the exact models behind 64.16. Large is a provisional frontier-system estimate; research backbones are not automatically the deployed stack.

Checked 2026-10-10 · low confidence

64.2%Uncertain weightsLargeEstimated2025-10Source ↗
7IBM CUGAIBM · System
Evaluation & model details

CUGA reports 61.7% on WebArena and publishes code, evaluation artifacts, and results.

CUGA orchestration is public, but the exact historical WebArena inference stack is not disclosed. The later AppWorld GPT-4.1 table is a different benchmark.

Harness code: open. Estimated for IBM CUGA historical WebArena model stack: no verified parameter count or standard token price, so the size class is provisional.

IBM CUGA historical WebArena model stack

Uncertain weights · Large · Estimated

The historical paper says its SOTA system uses a frontier model and that smaller/open-model experiments are future work, but does not pin the 61.7 WebArena stack. Large is provisional. GPT-4.1 in a later AppWorld table and modern gpt-4o configuration examples are not substituted.

Checked 2026-10-10 · low confidence

61.7%Uncertain weightsLargeEstimated2025-02-17Source ↗Repository ↗
8Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI · Model
Evaluation & model details

Technical report reports GUI-based browsing without external tools; Kimi K2.5 weights are publicly released.

Technical report identifies GUI-only Kimi K2.5 browsing without external tools. Weights are released; exact benchmark harness release was not verified. This is not Agent Swarm.

Harness code: uncertain. Published size: from the parameter count of Kimi K2.5.

Kimi K2.5

Open weights · Large · Published size · 1,000B total · 32B active

Modified-MIT weights verified in public repository (64 safetensors shards). Swarm orchestration is distinct from these model weights. Price table was absent from retrieved pricing text and direct retrieval was blocked; token rates omitted.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

58.9%Open weightsLarge2026-02Source ↗Repository ↗
9OpenAI OperatorOpenAI · System
Evaluation & model details

OpenAI Computer-Using Agent result reported with the Operator system card and public WebArena tracker.

Original January 2025 Operator/CUA result. Later computer-use-preview API pricing does not establish the original evaluated model's price.

Harness code: closed. Estimated for OpenAI original Computer-Using Agent (January 2025): no verified parameter count or standard token price, so the size class is provisional.

OpenAI original Computer-Using Agent (January 2025)

Closed weights · Large · Estimated

The original Operator CUA combines GPT-4o vision with reinforcement-learned reasoning. Its parameter count and January evaluation token prices are undisclosed. Large is a provisional category informed by the GPT-4o-based frontier architecture and later computer-use-preview pricing, not a parameter estimate or assertion that the March API snapshot is identical. Do not substitute later o3-based Operator or computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 for this historical model.

Checked 2026-10-10 · medium confidence

58.1%Closed weightsLargeEstimated2025-01Source ↗
10Jace.AI (AWA-1.5)Jace AI · System
Evaluation & model details

Jace reports AWA 1.5 at 57.14% on WebArena; implementation is proprietary.

Proprietary AWA-1.5 system; underlying checkpoints remain undisclosed.

Harness code: closed. Estimated for Jace AWA-1.5 model stack: no verified parameter count or standard token price, so the size class is provisional.

Jace AWA-1.5 model stack

Uncertain weights · Large · Estimated

The vendor report names AWA-1.5 and proprietary DOM processing but does not disclose participating checkpoints, their parameters, or standard token rates. Large is a provisional managed-agent estimate; weight availability remains unresolved.

Checked 2026-10-10 · low confidence

57.1%Uncertain weightsLargeEstimated2024-08Source ↗
11WebChallenger (GLM-4-32B)NewIndependent Research · Harness
Evaluation & model details

WebChallenger paper reports 56.3% over all 812 WebArena tasks using GLM-4-32B combined with Qwen-2.5-VL-7B as a vision model.

Paper explicitly uses GLM-4-32B-0414 controller plus Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct image captioning on WebArena. Qwen3-VL-4B is for VisualWebArena and is excluded here.

Harness code: open. Published size: from the parameter count of GLM-4-32B-0414, Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct. Size reflects the largest of 2 models; parameters are not summed.

GLM-4-32B-0414

Open weights · Small · Published size · 32B total

Publisher nominal 32B dense architecture; the exact off-the-shelf controller used by WebChallenger. Actual checkpoint files were verified in the public repository inventory.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct

Open weights · Small · Published size · 8.292B total

Publisher repository tensor total rounded in billions includes the visual component; the nominal 7B name refers to the model scale. This remains Small. Actual checkpoint files were verified in the public repository inventory.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

56.3%Open weightsSmallLargest component2026-06-09Source ↗Repository ↗
12Plan-MCTS + GPT-5-miniAcademic Research · Harness
Evaluation & model details

Plan-MCTS paper reports 55.3% on the full 812-task WebArena test set with GPT-5-mini.

Table 2 identifies GPT-5-mini for the plan-search configuration. Planning, operating and dual-gating are inference roles of the selected backbone. No released implementation link was found in the retrieved paper.

Harness code: uncertain. Price proxy: the size class comes from the standard token price of GPT-5 mini; parameters are undisclosed.

GPT-5 mini

Closed weights · Medium · Price proxy

Token price: $0.25 input / $2 output per million. Blended 3:1: $0.6875/M.

Parameters are undisclosed. Standard uncached USD text token prices per million determine the category; tool fees and cache/batch discounts are excluded. Published blend is $0.6875/M: Medium despite the mini product name.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

55.3%Closed weightsMediumPrice proxy2026-02Source ↗
13WebOperator + GPT-4oKAIST KAG NLP · System
Evaluation & model details

WebOperator paper and project report 54.6% with GPT-4o; code and experiment artifacts are public.

The paper calls its backend gpt-4o-2025-01-01, which is not a documented OpenAI snapshot. Released configuration uses an Azure deployment alias gpt-4o for action, reward and checklist generation, plus all-MiniLM-L6-v2 for semantic action deduplication. Preserve exact-version uncertainty.

Harness code: open. Estimated for GPT-4o (historical snapshot unspecified): no verified parameter count or standard token price, so the size class is provisional. Size reflects the largest of 2 models; parameters are not summed.

GPT-4o (historical snapshot unspecified)

Closed weights · Large · Estimated

Reports/configurations name GPT-4o without a verifiable snapshot or use an unpinned Azure deployment alias. Keep separate from May, August and November 2024 checkpoints. Large is provisional from known GPT-4o standard price tiers; no exact tariff or parameter count is assigned to these historical runs.

Checked 2026-10-10 · low confidence

all-MiniLM-L6-v2

Open weights · Tiny · Published size · 0.023B total

Repository tensor total. WebOperator enables this sentence embedding model to deduplicate candidate actions at runtime. Actual checkpoint files were verified in the public repository inventory.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

54.6%Mixed weightsLargeEstimatedLargest component2025-12Source ↗Repository ↗
14ScribeAgent + GPT-4oAcademic Research · System
Evaluation & model details

ScribeAgent reports 53.0% with GPT-4o; the tracker marks data as proprietary.

The 53.0 result combines the 32B ScribeAgent-Large fine-tune with GPT-4o for task decomposition/action-representation mapping. Proprietary training data does not prove whether exact fine-tuned weights were released; no matching release was located.

Harness code: uncertain. Estimated for GPT-4o (historical snapshot unspecified): no verified parameter count or standard token price, so the size class is provisional. Size reflects the largest of 2 models; parameters are not summed.

ScribeAgent-Large 32B

Uncertain weights · Small · Published size · 32B total

The paper identifies a Qwen2.5-32B fine-tune on proprietary workflow data. No evaluated checkpoint was linked in the inspected paper or found by Hugging Face search; do not infer open weights from the base.

Checked 2026-10-10 · medium confidence

GPT-4o (historical snapshot unspecified)

Closed weights · Large · Estimated

Reports/configurations name GPT-4o without a verifiable snapshot or use an unpinned Azure deployment alias. Keep separate from May, August and November 2024 checkpoints. Large is provisional from known GPT-4o standard price tiers; no exact tariff or parameter count is assigned to these historical runs.

Checked 2026-10-10 · low confidence

53.0%Uncertain weightsLargeEstimatedLargest component2024-12-24Source ↗
15AgentSymbioticAcademic Research · System
Evaluation & model details

AgentSymbiotic reports 52.1%; an anonymized public code artifact is linked from the tracker.

Table 1 assigns 52.1 to the Claude-3.5 RAG agent. Runtime trajectory embeddings are unidentified. Small distilled models and multi-LLM data synthesis are training machinery; optional privacy hybrid experiments do not establish they ran in this score configuration. Anonymous code retrieval returned HTTP 403.

Harness code: uncertain. Estimated for Claude 3.5 Sonnet (historical unpinned snapshot): no verified parameter count or standard token price, so the size class is provisional. Size reflects the largest of 2 models; parameters are not summed.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (historical unpinned snapshot)

Closed weights · Large · Estimated

The source identifies Claude 3.5 Sonnet but not its June/October snapshot. Provisional Large follows this proprietary frontier family; parameters and an exact evaluated-version tariff are not asserted. Snapshot-specific records remain separate.

Checked 2026-10-10 · low confidence

AgentSymbiotic undisclosed retrieval helper

Uncertain weights · Small · Estimated

Runtime trajectory similarity search requires embeddings; the retrieved paper does not identify the embedding checkpoint, and the linked anonymous code endpoint returned HTTP 403. Small is a provisional category for this specialized retrieval component, not a parameter assertion. Main Claude reasoning determines the overall Large category.

Checked 2026-10-10 · low confidence

52.1%Uncertain weightsLargeEstimatedLargest component2025-01Source ↗Repository ↗
16Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B-24GBNewNVIDIA · Model
Evaluation & model details

IQ2-quantized (24GB) release of the open-weight 74B-A9B model; full 812-task set with a 100-step limit. Self-reported on the NVIDIA model card.

IQ2-quantized 24GB checkpoint on the full 812-task set with a 100-step limit; self-reported on the NVIDIA model card.

Harness code: uncertain. Published size: from the parameter count of Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B-24GB.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B-24GB

Open weights · Medium · Published size · 74B total · 9B active

NVIDIA publishes 74B total / 9B active parameters. IQ2-quantized checkpoint, about 24GB. Open weights under the OpenMDW License Agreement v1.1.

Checked 2026-10-14 · high confidence

50.86%Open weightsMedium2026-10-15Source ↗Repository ↗
17Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B-BF16NewNVIDIA · Model
Evaluation & model details

Full-precision BF16 weights of the open-weight 74B-A9B model; full 812-task set with a 100-step limit. Self-reported on the NVIDIA model card.

BF16 checkpoint on the full 812-task set with a 100-step limit; self-reported on the NVIDIA model card.

Harness code: uncertain. Published size: from the parameter count of Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B-BF16.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B-BF16

Open weights · Medium · Published size · 74B total · 9B active

NVIDIA publishes 74B total / 9B active parameters. Full-precision BF16 checkpoint. Open weights under the OpenMDW License Agreement v1.1.

Checked 2026-10-14 · high confidence

50.25%Open weightsMedium2026-10-15Source ↗Repository ↗
18Learn-by-InteractAcademic Research · System
Evaluation & model details

Paper reports 48.0% on WebArena; no public implementation repository was found.

The 48.0 result is Claude-3.5 Sonnet with in-context agentic retrieval, not the 22B fine-tune. Vertex text embeddings perform runtime dense retrieval. Gemini filtering and Claude grading used for dataset/evaluation preparation are excluded.

Harness code: uncertain. Estimated for Claude 3.5 Sonnet (historical unpinned snapshot): no verified parameter count or standard token price, so the size class is provisional. Size reflects the largest of 2 models; parameters are not summed.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (historical unpinned snapshot)

Closed weights · Large · Estimated

The source identifies Claude 3.5 Sonnet but not its June/October snapshot. Provisional Large follows this proprietary frontier family; parameters and an exact evaluated-version tariff are not asserted. Snapshot-specific records remain separate.

Checked 2026-10-10 · low confidence

Learn-by-Interact historical Vertex embedding helper

Uncertain weights · Small · Estimated

The appendix names Vertex AI text embeddings for runtime dense retrieval but gives no model version. The mutable linked guide now demonstrates newer Gemini embeddings, which cannot identify the January 2025 helper. Small is a low-confidence specialized-retrieval estimate; no count or output-token price is fabricated.

Checked 2026-10-10 · low confidence

48.0%Uncertain weightsLargeEstimatedLargest component2025-01Source ↗
19WebUncertainty + GPT-4-TurboNewAcademic Research · Harness
Evaluation & model details

WebUncertainty reports 46.9% with GPT-4-Turbo on WebArena and publishes the project repository.

Paper explicitly pins GPT-4-turbo-2024-04-09. Public repository currently contains README, project assets and dependency metadata but no executable agent implementation; a public repository alone does not establish released harness code.

Harness code: uncertain. Price proxy: the size class comes from the standard token price of GPT-4 Turbo (2024-04-09); parameters are undisclosed.

GPT-4 Turbo (2024-04-09)

Closed weights · Large · Price proxy

Token price: $10 input / $30 output per million. Blended 3:1: $15/M.

Parameters are undisclosed. Standard uncached USD text token prices per million determine the category; tool fees and cache/batch discounts are excluded. The stable Turbo snapshot is distinct from earlier previews.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

46.9%Closed weightsLargePrice proxy2026-04Source ↗Repository ↗
20AgentOccam-JudgeAmazon Science · Harness
Evaluation & model details

AgentOccam-Judge public tracker row; Amazon Science publishes the AgentOccam implementation.

AgentOccam uses GPT-4-Turbo-2024-04-09; the added runtime action-selection judge is GPT-4-Turbo as well. This judge affects actions and is included through the same deduplicated model ID, unlike a post-run scoring judge.

Harness code: open. Price proxy: the size class comes from the standard token price of GPT-4 Turbo (2024-04-09); parameters are undisclosed.

GPT-4 Turbo (2024-04-09)

Closed weights · Large · Price proxy

Token price: $10 input / $30 output per million. Blended 3:1: $15/M.

Parameters are undisclosed. Standard uncached USD text token prices per million determine the category; tool fees and cache/batch discounts are excluded. The stable Turbo snapshot is distinct from earlier previews.

Checked 2026-10-10 · high confidence

45.7%Closed weightsLargePrice proxy2024-10Source ↗Repository ↗

About this benchmark

WebArena evaluates browser agents in reproducible, self-hosted websites instead of the open live web. Its 812 tasks cover e-commerce, forum discussion, collaborative software development, content management, maps, and reference lookup.

The benchmark is strongest when you care about repeatable web-agent experiments: every task has a controlled start state and functional success criteria rather than a changing production website.

Because many rows come from a public community tracker, a WebArena score should be read alongside the source, submitted scaffold, observation mode, and whether the result was independently reproduced.

Controlled environments improve reproducibility, but tracker rows still vary by scaffold and submission policy.

Filtered task-set or modified-grader reports are not ranked as full WebArena results unless the row notes that setup explicitly.

Example tasks

Three public tasks quoted from benchmark sources:

Methodology

  • Primary metric is end-to-end task success rate on the WebArena task set; the original GPT-4-based baseline was 14.41% versus 78.24% human performance.
  • Evaluation checks functional correctness through task-specific validators and answer checks in the hosted environment.
  • Scores can change with prompt scaffolding, observation mode, browser action space, and retry or step budget.
  • We prefer rows tied to WebArena's public leaderboard, papers, or repositories that include enough setup detail to reproduce the run.

Related benchmarks

Compare this benchmark with related pages from the hub:

Back to benchmark hub

Frequently asked questions

Which system is currently best on WebArena? +
WebTactix (DeepSeek v3.2) is the system/agent setup currently leading with a tracked score of 74.3%. This ranking reflects submitted system setups (model plus tools and policy), not just a base model. Based on our latest tracked results, last updated Oct 11, 2026.
What should I read into a WebArena score? +
WebArena scores are most useful for within-benchmark ranking. Read the Notes column to understand setup context, and use the methodology section before making procurement or architecture decisions.
Are these independently verified? +
Not always. Some rows are independently benchmarked and some are team-reported. Use each source link and notes field to verify evidence level before drawing strong conclusions.